SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4561

PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, J
Subhash Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Dhannjay Kumar Ii
For the Respondents: Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhannjay Kumar Ii, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

3 22-01-2026 Heard Mr. Dhannjay Kumar Ii, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

02.09.2025 in connection with Chanpatiya P.S. Case No. 178 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 01.09.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 15(2), 118(1), 109(1), 352, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 .

3. According to prosecution case, the informant alleged that when he was walking in front of his house after dinner then all of a sudden the petitioner along with other co-

accused persons came and assaulted him with knife.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is false and fabricated. Although there is specific allegation against the petitioner that he has assaulted the informant and the informant re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top