SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4573

PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, J
Bobby Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Santosh Kumar Singh
For the Respondents: Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, APP

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Santosh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

3 22-01-2026 Heard Mr. Santosh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

01.06.2025 in connection with Chautham P.S. Case No. 134 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 29.05.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita , 2023.

3. According to prosecution case, the informant alleged that his motorcycle was stolen by someone when he parket it in front of gate and went to participate in Kharif Maha Abhiyan Program. Hence the FIR.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. It appears from the FIR that date of the occurrence was on 28.05.2025 but the FIR was lodge on 29.05.2025 i.e. after delay of one day without giving any reason of delay. The petitioner is not named in the FIR and his name transpired during investi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top