SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4578

PATNA HIGH COURT
Rajesh Kumar Verma, J
Dilip Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Sheonandan Pandit
For the Respondents: Mr. Md. Ataur Rahman, APP

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sheonandan Pandit, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Ataur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

3 22-01-2026 Heard Mr. Sheonandan Pandit, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Md. Ataur Rahman, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

06.03.2024 in connection with Session Trial No. 48 of 2025, arising out of Kadirganj P.S. Case No. 29 of 2024, F.I.R. dated 06.03.2024 for the offences punishable under Section 304(B) of B.N.S. , 2023.

3. According to prosecution case, petitioner and other co-accused persons are alleged to have killed the daughter of the informant due to non-fulfillment of demand of motorcycle as dowry.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR and the petitioner has been made accused merely on the ground that he is the husband of the deceased. From bare perusal of F.I.R. it appears that there is no specific allegation of assault, overt act or demand of dowry is attributed agains

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top