SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4581

PATNA HIGH COURT
Rajesh Kumar Verma, J
Sanket Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Raghvendra Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, APP

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghvendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

3 22-01-2026 Heard Mr. Raghvendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail, who are in custody since

21.07.2025 in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 34 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 13.01.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 but the Police has submitted chargesheet under sections

126(2), 115(2), 103(1), 352, 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

3. According to prosecution case, petitioners and other co-accused persons are alleged to have assaulted the husband of the informant and her son. The specific allegation of assault is upon co-accused Rameshi Paswan who assaulted the informant’s husband with iron rod on his head due to which he died.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that petitioners have clean antecedent and they have falsely been implicated in the present case. From bare perusal of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top