SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4582

PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, J
Amar Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Md Shahid Akhtar
For the Respondents: Mr. Anil Kumar, APP

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md Shahid Akhtar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

3 22-01-2026 Heard Mr. Md. Shahid Akhtar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Anil Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

04.05.2025 in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No. 171 of 2025, S.Tr. No.421/2025, F.I.R. dated 03.05.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. , 2023.

3. According to prosecution case, petitioner and co-

accused person are alleged to have assaulted the informant’s bhanja with bamboo stick. The specific allegation of assault is attributed against co-accused Munna Kumar and due to assault he died.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. Although, the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. but from a bare perusal of F.I.R. the specific allegation of assault is attributed against the co-accused person, namely, Munna Kumar. He further submits th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top