SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4585

PATNA HIGH COURT
Rajesh Kumar Verma, J
Dadan Mishra – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Akhileshwar Pandey
For the Respondents: Mr. Kanhaiya Kishore, APP

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akhileshwar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kanhaiya Kishore, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

3 22-01-2026 Heard Mr. Akhileshwar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Kanhaiya Kishore, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

11.07.2025 in connection with Session Trial No. 768 of 2025, arising out of Bhagwan Bazar P.S. Case No. 170 of 2006, F.I.R. dated 06.09.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections

304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code .

3. According to prosecution case, petitioner and other co-accused persons are alleged to have tortured and killed the daughter of the complainant for demand of one motorcycle as dowry.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that Police have submitted final form in favour of the petitioner and not s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top