SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4587

PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, J
Sanoj Kumar @ Sanoj Sah – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Ugresh Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ugresh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

3 22-01-2026 Heard Mr. Ugresh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

01.08.2025 in connection with Motipur P.S. Case No. 208 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 23.06.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 85, 80, 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. According to prosecution case, petitioner and other co-accused persons are alleged to have killed the daughter of the informant due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner was not present at the time of occurrence.

During investigation, in paragraph no. 21 of the case diary, it has come that deceased has committed suicide herself and the petitioner was working at Gujarat and petitioner has got knowledge about the p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top