PATNA HIGH COURT
Rajesh Kumar Verma, J
Deepak Pandey – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jai Prakash Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
3 22-01-2026 Heard Mr. Jai Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, learned APP for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since
01.09.2025, in connection with Nawada P.S. Case No. 12 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 07.01.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S. .
3. The F.I.R. of the occurrence of loot is against unknown.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the name of the petitioner has been transpired on the basis of suspicion and the petitioner has been remanded in the present case from Nawada P.S. Case No. 496 of 2025 and on the basis of self confessional statement of the petitioner the looted mobile was recovered from other co-accued person. He further submits that although recovery has been made from the possession of co-acc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.