SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4589

PATNA HIGH COURT
Rajesh Kumar Verma, J
Deepak Pandey – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Jai Prakash Singh
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, APP

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jai Prakash Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

3 22-01-2026 Heard Mr. Jai Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

01.09.2025, in connection with Nawada P.S. Case No. 12 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 07.01.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S. .

3. The F.I.R. of the occurrence of loot is against unknown.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the name of the petitioner has been transpired on the basis of suspicion and the petitioner has been remanded in the present case from Nawada P.S. Case No. 496 of 2025 and on the basis of self confessional statement of the petitioner the looted mobile was recovered from other co-accued person. He further submits that although recovery has been made from the possession of co-acc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top