PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, J
Tulsi Baitha @ Akhileshwar Baitha – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
3 22-01-2026 Heard Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, learned APP for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since
19.11.2025, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 579 of 2015 arising out of Yogapatti P.S. Case No. 15 of 2006, F.I.R. dated 09.01.2006 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147 , 148, 149, 323, 324, 307, 447, 504 of the Indian Penal Code .
3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other co-accused person has assaulted the informant by means of Gadasi due to which he sustained injury.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that it appears from the F.I.R. that due to admitted land dispute the present occurrence had taken place and one Title Suit No. 241 of 1992 is pending between the parties for the same set of land. Although the petitioner is named
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.