SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4605

PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, J
Shekh Saddam – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Md Musowir
For the Respondents: Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md Musowir, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

2 27-01-2026 Heard Mr. Md. Musowir, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

24.10.2025 in connection with Amdabad P.S. Case No. 255 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 23.10.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 64(1), 332(b), 352, 351(2), 351(3), 3(5) of the BNS , 2023.

3. According to prosecution case, petitioner is alleged to have committed rape with the victim and also tried to assault the husband of the victim with hasua.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that the allegation as alleged in the FIR is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. Learned counsel further submits that the informant is own sister-in-law of the petitioner and due to some admitted land dispute, the pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top