Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, J
Mrityunjay Kumar Yadav @ Mrityunjay Kumar @ Mrityunjay Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. lack of specific allegations warranting bail. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. conditions imposed for bail release. (Para 5 , 6) |
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brij Nandan Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
2 27-01-2026 Heard Mr. Brij Nandan Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since
22.11.2025 in connection with Bounsi P.S. Case No. 237 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 04.11.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. According to prosecution case, petitioner and other accused persons are alleged to have assaulted the son of the informant with lathi and danda and also snatched golden chain from him.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that the allegation as alleged in the FIR is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as all
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
