SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4609

PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, J
Nitish Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Shankar Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr. Anil Kumar, APP

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shankar Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

2 27-01-2026 Heard Mr. Shankar Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Anil Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

23.10.2025 in connection with Kadirganj P.S. Case No. 231 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 03.08.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2) & 352 of the BNS , 2023.

3. According to prosecution case, all the FIR named accused persons, including the petitioner armed with lathi, danda and iron rod surrounded the vehicle of the informant and assaulted them and also snatched Rs. 1,62,000/- from the pocket of the cousin of the informant. It is further alleged that the petitioner has snatched gold locket from the neck of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. Although, the petitioner is named in the FIR but from a bare perusal of FIR it appears t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top