IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15683 of 2016 ======================================================

Smt. Sumitra Devi ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar and Ors.

... ... Respondent/s ======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tej Narayan Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sajid Salim Khan, SC-25 ======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER

6 19-01-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s):

“(i) for quashing the order dated

16/05/03 passed in Mutation Appeal No-2/97-98 by the learned DCLR, Barh, Patna whereby the learned DCLR has review his own order dated 08/04/01 passed in earlier Mutation Appeal No-

6/96-97/2/98-99.

(ii) for the direction may given to maintain the order dated 08/04/01 passed in Mutation Appeal No-6/96-97/2/98-99 by learned DCLR, Barh, Patna with regard to the same land.

(iii) for restrain the private respondent from interfering the peaceful possession of the petitioner till the disposal of the present writ application.

(iv) for any other relief/relief's for which the petitioner is entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case.

I.A. No. 3 of 2024

3. The aforesaid Interlocutory Application has been preferred for substitution of respondent no.9 and 10 namely Rajkumari Devi and Madan Singh respectively with that of the heirs as recorded paragraph no.2 of the petition as follows:

9(a) Sachida Nand Singh Husband

9(b) Pankaj Kumar Son 9(c) Gyan Prakash Son 9(d) Sashank Kumar Son

9(e) Priyanka Kumari Daughter 9(f) Sadhna Kumari Daughter And

10(b)(b) Mangul Singh Grand Son

10(b)(c) Vishal Singh

10(d) Ashok Singh Son 10(e) Deepak Kumar Singh Son 10(f) Pohu Singh Son

10(g) Dablu Singh (died) Nisha Singh (wife)

Rudra Pratap Singh (Grandson)

10)h) Rama Kumari Daughter 10(i) Manju Devi Daughter

4. There is no objection from the other side, in that background, the respondent no.9 and respondent no.10 namely Rajkumari Devi and Madan Singh be substituted by the heirs as recorded above.

5. Office to the needful.

6. I.A. No. 3 of 2024 is disposed of.

CWJC No. 15683 of 2016

7. List this case accordingly.

(Rajiv Roy, J)

vinayak/-

U