SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 5267

PATNA HIGH COURT
Ramesh Sahni
CWJC-2182/2015



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2182 of 2015 ======================================================

Ramesh Sahni ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar and Ors ... ... Respondent/s ======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar Verma, Advocate Mr. Suman Kumer Verma, Advocate Mr. Anish Kumar, Advocate Mr. Amresh Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Pankaj Kumar (SC-12)

Mr. Devendra Kumar, Advocate Mr. Kamlesh Kumar, AC to SC-12 ======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER

3 09-02-2026 Heard the parties.

2.The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:

(i) for the issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari seeking therein quashment of the order dated 02.02.14/26.08.14 passed by the learned court of Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur in Bihar Land Disputes Resolution Appeal Case being no. 463/12 setting aside the order dated 10.04.12 by the Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Sheohar in Case No. 132/11-12 directing therein the Circle Officer, Piprahi and the Officer-in-Charge, Piprahi P.S. to hand over the possession of the land measuring 3/4 decimals under Thana No.-146 relating to Khata No. 933, Khesra No. 2230 under Mauza-Deokuli Dharampur in the district of Sheohar thereby allowing the appeal filed by Respondent No.8 (Shri Ram Rai) as also for further direction upon the Respondent State Authorities to hand over and restore the possession of the aforesaid land having been settled in favour of the Petitioner vide land settlement case no. 5/09-10 by the Circle Officer, Piprahi, Sheohar dated

10.03.10 forthwith.

3. This application shall be heard.

4. The State receives notice on behalf of respondent nos. 01 to 07. The respondent no.08 is also represented.

5. Pleadings to be exchanged in six months. 6. Rule is made returnable within one year.

(Rajiv Roy, J)

Ravi/-

U

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top