Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
RAKESH KUMAR, PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL, JJ
Sukan Sada – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background and contradictions in witness statements. (Para 5 , 8) |
| 2. court's findings regarding the insufficiency of evidence leading to acquittal. (Para 10 , 12 , 21) |
| 3. arguments from defense raising reasonable doubt about prosecution evidence. (Para 13 , 14) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL)
Date : 16-04-2019
Both the appeals were appealed through jail, and as such, at the time of admission, Mr. Arun Kumar Tripathi and Mr. Shyama Kant Singh were appointed as amicus curiae to assist the Court. In both the appeals, the appellants were convicted and sentenced by a common judgment, and as such, both the appeals were taken up together under the heading for hearing and are being disposed of by this common judgment.
2. Heard Mr. Arun Kumar Tripathi learned Amicus Curiae for the appellant in Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 958 of 2013 and Mr. Shyama Kant Singh learned Amicus Curiae for the appellant in Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 959 of 2013 as well as Mr. Ajay Mishra learned Addl. Public Prosecutor in the aforesaid appeals.
3. The aforesaid two criminal appeals have been preferred against the judgment and order of conviction dated 29.05.2013 and order o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
