Back
PRINCIPAL BENCH PATNA
HONOURABLE MR. SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH, HONOURABLE MR. ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI, JJ
Md. Raja – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. defense's denial and evidence presented. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 2. mandatory compliance of n.d.p.s. act provisions. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. importance of statutory provisions in search. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. inconsistencies in evidence and investigation errors. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 5. final decision on appeals. (Para 21) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI
Date: 18-11-2016
Against the judgment of conviction and sentence impugned all these appeals have arisen on account thereof have been heard together and are being decided by a common judgment.
2. Appellant Md. Raja (Cr. Appeal (DB) No.1102 of 2013), appellant Md. Salim (Cr. Appeal (DB) No.1078 of 2013), appellant Md.Farukh (Cr. Appeal (DB) No.1099 of 2013), appellant Inamul @ Md. Inamul (Cr. Appeal (DB) No.1076 of 2013), appellant Bikash Yadav (Cr. Appeal (DB) No.33 of 2014) and appellant Sandeep Kumar Singh (Cr. Appeal (DB) No.1089 of 2013) have been found guilty u/s 20 as well as 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act vide judgment of conviction dated 3.10.2013, and each one has been independently sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 15 years as well as fine of Rs.1 lac, in default thereof to undergo rigorous imprisonment fo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
