SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 7


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7279 of 2020 ======================================================
11. Mira Devi, Late Dilip Kumar, Resident of Maner Bazar, P.O. and P.S.
Maner, District- Patna.
22. Farid Hussain Khan, Son of Wahid Hussain Khan, Resident of Char Hazar, near Maner Dargah, P.O. and P.S. Maner, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar Through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
33. The District Magistrate-cum- District Election Officer (Municipality), Patna, District- Patna.
44. The Sub- Divisional Officer Danapur, District- Patna.
55. The Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Maner, P.O. and P.S.- Maner, District- Patna.
66. Smt. Sunita Verma, Wife of not known to the petitioner.
77. Sri Manoj Kumar Son of not known to the petitioner. 8. Smt. Amrita Devi Wife of not known to the petitioner. 9. Smt. Manju Devi Wife of not known to the petitioner.
10. Sri Ravindra Kumar Saundik Son of not known to the petitioner.
11. Smt. Mira Devi Wife of not known to the petitioner. 12. Smt. Rekha Rai Wife of not known to the petitioner.
13. Sri Amol Bajaj Son of not known to the petitioner.
14. Sri Sanjay Kumar Son of not known to the petitioner. 15. Smt. Babita Devi Wife of not known to the petitioner.
16. Sri Sanjay Singh Son of not known to the petitioner. 17. Smt. Asha Devi Wife of not known to the petitioner.
18. Smt. Karuna Devi Wife of not known to the petitioner.
19. Smt. Meena Kumari Wife of not known to the petitioner.
20. Smt. Rinku Devi Wife of not known to the petitioner.
21. Smt. Madhuri Devi Wife of not known to the petitioner.
22. Smt. Meena Devi Wife of not known to the petitioner.
Respondent Nos. 6 to 22 are the Ward Councillors of Nagar Panchayat, Maner, through the Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Maner, P.O. and P.S.- Maner, District- Patna.
... ... Respondent/s ======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shashi Bhushan Kumar Manglam, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Y.P. Sinha, AAG-7 Mr. Y.C. Verma, Sr. Advocate Mr. Vinay Kumar Mishra, Advocate Sri Prakash Srivastava, Advocate Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate Mr. Amit Srivastava, Advocate Mr. Girish Pandey, Advocate For Nagar Panchayat : Anil Kumar, Advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY

Advocates:
['Shashi Bhushan Kumar Manglam', 'LALIT KISHORE AG', '', 'P K Verma AAG']

ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 05-02-2021 

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records of the case.

In the present case, the petitioners are seeking quashing of the proceedings of special meeting dated 07.08.2020 of Nagar Panchayat, Maner, which was convened for consideration of “No Confidence Motion" against the petitioners, who were holding the post of Chief Councillor and Deputy Chief Councillor respectively and further seeking direction to the respondent authorities for reinstatement of the petitioners to the post, which they were holding before they were removed i.e. on 07.08.2020 through the “No Confidence Motion” passed against them by the majority of Ward Councillors of the said Nagar Panchayat.

The petitioners contested the election of Ward Councillors of Maner Nagar Panchayat and they were declared successful. Both the petitioners again contested the election for the post of Chief Councillor and Deputy Chief Councillor and both have been declared successful, accordingly, they started discharging their respective duties. It has been alleged that in the year 2019, a move was made for “No Confidence Motion” against the petitioners, but the majority of the Ward Councillors did not support the motion, ensued the rejection of motion. After completion of one year, they mustered the courage and made a second move for “No Confidence Motion” by allegedly serving a notice dated 14.07.2020 through the office of the Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Maner vide letter no. 531 dated 15.07.2020 bearing the signatures of ten Ward Councillors being more than 1/3rd Ward Councillors, which is required under the Bihar Municipal Act, 2007 (hereinafter mentioned Bihar Municipal Act).

As per the petitioners, the husband of petitioner no.1 died in July, 2020, the copy of requisition was not served upon the petitioner no.1, on account of fact that it is a custom in her society that after the death of her husband, she was to stay at her parental house for one and quarter month. On account of death of her husband, her mother-in-law could not bear the shock and she had fallen seriously ill, on account of serious illness of her mother-in- law, she had no alternative option but to come back to her in-laws house on 13.07.2020, but she was not attending the office. It has been asserted that requisition was sent by the office of Executive Officer, but the same could not be served upon her as she had to leave her house for the purpose of treatment of her mother-in-law and when she returned back on 22.07.2020, a copy of requisition was served upon her on 23.07.2020. In the requisition, charges have been mentioned that while discharging their duties, they do not follow the provisions of Bihar Municipal Act. It has further been alleged that they engaged themselves in changing, manipulating and fabricating the decision taken in the meeting and thereby they altered the decision for their own convenience. It has further been alleged that the Chief Councillor and the Deputy Chief Councillor were indulged in illegal act and misappropriated the public fund and the money spent in the Nagar Panchayat was converted for their own benefits. In the charges, it has further been alleged that they obstructed the development of Nagar Panchayat. A serious allegation has been made against the petitioners that they, being the Chief Councillors and Deputy Chief Councillor, were obtaining a contract of Maner Nagar Panchayat in the names of their family members and near relatives and the work done is very low quality and thereby they misappropriated the huge fund of Nagar Panchayat, Maner. It is stated that unfortunately, ailing mother-in-law of the petitioner no. 1 died on 24.07.2020 and her dead body was cremated on the next day and, as such, whole family was under deep shock on account of two deaths of her family member, even though, she was reeling under the deep shock, the petitioner no.1 continued to discharge her duty as per statutory provision. On receipt of requ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top