SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 7

PATNA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH PATNA
STATE OF BIHAR and ORS – Appellant
Versus
RAM CHANDRA SINGH – Respondent


Advocates:
['S QAISAR HASAN', '', 'SC', 'Shakti Suman Kumar', '', 'UMA KANT SHUKLA', 'RAJESH RANJAN']

C.A.V. JUDGMENT

Date : 07-08-2020

Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the judgment dated 14.08.2003 and decree dated 27.08.2003 passed by the learned Sub-Judge-VIII, East Champaran at Motihari in Title Suit No.107 of 1998/174 of 2002, whereby and whereunder the suit has been decreed on contest with cost, the defendant-appellants challenged the same by way of instant appeal.

It looks wise to address the parties by their original status as they stood before the learned lower court.

2. Briefly stated the case of the parties are as follows:

Respondent-plaintiff asking for the relief that on an adjudication of the facts and circumstances the order of the defendants be declared illegal, improper, arbitrary, whereby the order to stop with the work of allotted tender as well as for recovery of Rs.50,000/- so paid as an advance amount, a decree for Rs.3,00,000/- with proper interest be passed till realisation of the amount in lieu of expenses so incurred during course of purchase of construction materials as well as, expenses incurred in digging plinth, removal of accumulated water, construction up to plinth as per work order issued by the defendants in his favour, injuncting the defendants

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top