SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 6716

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Soni Shrivastava, J
Vikram Rai
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79972 of 2025 | PS. Case No.-65 Year-2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Subodh Kumar, Priyam Kumari
For the Respondents: Anil Kumar Singh No. 1

Bail may be granted when the informant clarifies that the First Information Report was lodged based on a mistake of fact, thereby undermining the prosecution's primary allegations.

Headnote:The case involves allegations under Sections 304(B) and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, where the accused was alleged to have killed the informant's daughter due to non-fulfillment of dowry demands. The petitioner contended that the death was actually caused by a heart attack and highlighted that the informant had filed an application before the court stating that the FIR was lodged based on a mistake of fact. The court noted that this application was part of the record and corroborated by the report of the Sessions Judge. The primary issue was whether the petitioner should be granted bail given the nature of the charges and the subsequent clarification by the informant. The court reasoned that since the informant herself admitted the case was instituted on a mistake of fact, and considering the petitioner's lack of criminal antecedents and the current stage of the trial, the grounds for detention were significantly diminished. let the above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-Ist Class, Vaishali at Hajipur /concerned Court below in connection with Mahnar P.S. Case No. 65 of 2024

Table of Content
1. prosecution allegations regarding dowry death under the indian penal code. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. defense claim of mistake of fact versus state's opposition to bail. (Para 4 , 5)
3. grant of bail based on informant's admission of mistake of fact. (Para 6 , 7)

ORAL ORDER

7 27-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner along with other co-accused persons is said to have killed the daughter of the informant due to non-fulfillment of dowry demand.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, who is the husband of the deceased along with his family members has falsely been made accused in the present case although the daughter of the informant had died on account of heart attack and the informant realizing her mistake filed an application before the Court concerned, which is Annexure-P/2 bringing the said facts on record. The petitioner is in custody since 27.08.2025 with no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the grant of bail on the basis of allegations made in the First Information Report.

6. A report had been called for with regard to the stage of the case, which indicates that charges have already been framed on 15.01.2026 and an application along with power has been filed on 03.05.2024 by the informant which is part of the record and the said application has also been brought on record by the learned Trial Court along with the report with regard to the stage of the trial which indicates that the informant had lodged the F.I.R. on a mistake of fact.

7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and considering the fact that the informant has filed an application with regard to the case being instituted on mistake of fact and such application, being part of the record even as per the report of the learned Sessions Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-Ist Class, Vaishali at Hajipur /concerned Court below in connection with Mahnar P.S. Case No. 65 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top