SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 5815

PATNA HIGH COURT
Khatim Reza, J.
Arun Kumar Gupta v. Manas Sah Alias Manas Shaw


1. Heard Mr. Vaidehi Raman Prasad Singh, learned counsel for the appellant and Ms. Sushmita Mishra, learned counsel for the respondents.

2. This Second Appeal has been filed by the defendant / respondent - appellant challenging the judgment and decree of the learned appellate court below.

3. The matter arises out of Eviction Suit No. 01 of 2013 which was filed by the plaintiffs / appellants - respondents for eviction of sole defendant on the ground of personal necessity of the plaintiffs for the suit premises and also on the ground of default in payment of rent by the defendant.

4. On 31.01.2023 these following substantial questions of law were formulated while admitting the appeal: -
(i). Whether the rent for the month of October and November having being sent by Money Order in December which was refused by the land lord could be held by appellate court to be a defaulter?
(ii). Whether the judgment of learned appellate court is vitiated on account of non - consideration of the reasonings of learned trial court while reversing its findings?
(iii). Whether the findings of the appellate court is based on the errors of record and non - consideration of material evidence both oral and d


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top