SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 5821

PATNA HIGH COURT
*Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, Ashok Kumar Pandey, JJ.
Laxmi Narayan Alias Nankha v. State of Bihar


1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned counsel for the informant as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. This appeal has been preferred for setting aside of the judgment of conviction dated 23.08.2018 (hereinafter referred to as the 'impugned judgment') and order of sentence dated 24.08.2018 ( hereinafter referred to as the 'impugned order') passed by learned Additional Judge - I - cum - Special Judge, Sexual Offences Act, (POCSO), Munger (hereinafter referred to as the 'learned trial court') in Dharhara P.S. Case No. 42 of 2017, G.R. No. 707 of 2017, POCSO Case No. 09 of 2017 whereby and whereunder the appellant has been convicted for the offence under S.376 of the Indian Penal Code (in short 'IPC') and S.3 / 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (in short 'POCSO Act') and he has been ordered to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life with a fine of Rs.25,000/- under S.376, IPC and rigorous imprisonment for life with a fine of Rs.25,000/- under S.4 of the POCSO Act. In default of payment of fine, he has to undergo further imprisonment for six months. Both the sentences are to run concurrently.

3. Prosecution Case
The presen






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top