1. Heard Mr. Brij Bihari Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Md. Waliur Rahman, learned counsel for the opposite parties.

2. A tenant under a decree of eviction questions its correctness in the present revision application.

3. This civil revision application has been preferred by the defendant - petitioner against the judgment and decree dated 04.03.2024, passed in Title Eviction Suit No. 456 of 2014 by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) - III, Patna Sadar. The said decree was passed under S.11(1)(c) of the Bihar Building (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as 'the BBC Act', for the sake of brevity), on the ground of personal necessity.

4. The plaintiffs - opposite parties are the owners of the suit premises. They instituted the present eviction suit against the defendant - petitioner on two grounds as envisaged under S.11(1)(c) and S.11(1)(e) of the BBC Act. It was contended that the suit premises are required reasonably and in good faith by plaintiff no. 1 for her own occupation as she intends to establish a boutique therein with the help of plaintiff No. 3, who is currently unemployed. Further, the plaintiffs also asserted