IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11197 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-221 Year-2025 Thana- MADHAURAH District- Saran ======================================================

1. Mina Devi W/O Om Prakash Mahto R/O Bara Nautan, Ward No. 10, P.S-

Madhaura, District- Saran.

2. Sonu Kumar S/O Om Prakash Mahto R/O Bara Nautan, Ward No. 10, P.S-

Madhaura, District- Saran.

3. Suganti Devi W/O Jay Prakash Mahto R/O Bara Nautan, Ward No. 10, P.S-

Madhaura, District- Saran.

4. Sarita Devi @ Arita Devi @ Sabita Devi W/O Ram Prakash Mahto R/O Bara Nautan, Ward No. 10, P.S- Madhaura, District- Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Nawnit Kumar Tiwary, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Harendra Prasad, Adv.

Mr. Madan Kumar, Adv.

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER

2 25-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in a case instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 303(2), 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per prosecution case, the allegation against the petitioners and others is that they assaulted the informant and his sons due to which they sustained injuries.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. The petitioners and informant are agnates and they have falsely been implicated in this case due to village politics. There is no specific allegation levelled against the petitioners, rather general and omnibus allegation levelled against them. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Specific allegation of assault has been made against other co-

accused persons

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of this order and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Madhaura P.S. Case no. 221 of 2025, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS).

(S. B. Pd. Singh, J)

Manish/-

U