IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7045 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-322 Year-2025 Thana- PIPRAKOTHI District- East Champaran ======================================================

Md. Tabrej Alam Son of Late Md. Hadis Resident of Village- Chand Saraiya (Baltharwa), P.S.- Piprakothi, District- East Champaran, Motihari ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Md. Aslam Ansari, APP For the Informant : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate ======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

2 19-02-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 340(2), 308(2), 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, fraudulently sold the land of informant without any right, title and possession. It is further alleged that when informant asked the accused persons, all of them, abused and assaulted informant and his brother and demanded Rangdari of Rs. 10,00,000/-.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case merely because he happens to be identifier of the sale deed in question. Petitioner is neither vendor nor vendee of the alleged sale deed. Moreover, the dispute is with regard to sale and purchase of land, which is purely civil in nature. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Piprakothi P.S. Case No. 322 of

2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

shashank/-

U T