IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87854 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-121 Year-2024 Thana- ALIPUR District- Gaya ======================================================

Md. Sahnbaz Alam @ Shahnabaz Alam @ Md. Shahanawaz Alam @ Shahanawaz Alam@ Md. Shahnawaz Alam S/o- Md. Sabir Ansari R/v-

Makhdumpur Ps- Alipur Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Aryan Singh, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

2 11-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. This is the second attempt on behalf of the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Alipur P.S.Case No. 121 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 309(4) of the BNS and section 25(1-b) (a),26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner has been rejected vide order dated 16.04.2025 passed in Cr. Misc.

No.17879 of 2025 which reads as under:-

“ Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Alipur P.S. Case No. 121 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections

25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3.The mobile phone was snatched on gun point by unknown criminals. Two criminals were caught by the police. The country made pistol and the looted mobile was recovered from three persons. The petitioner was caught on the spot and isin custody since 19.08.2024.

4. Considering the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner

5. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

6. The Court below is directed to expedite the trial.”

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the charge has not been framed.

5. Considering the gravity of the offence and the fact that charge has not been framed, I am not inclined to review my earlier order.

6. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

7. The learned trial court is directed to frame charge at the earliest.

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

N.K/-

U