IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7840 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-331 Year-2024 Thana- MADHAURAH District- Saran ======================================================

Bali Nut, S/o Daharu Nut @ Dinesh Nut R/o Village - BajitBhoraha, P.S -

Marhowrah, District - Saran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Hemant Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Uday Chand Prasad ======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

2 10-02-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has earlier moved before this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc. No.76020 of 2024. It is further submitted that Cr. Misc. No.76020 of 2024 came to be allowed by an order dated 06.12.2024 with a condition that the learned trial Court after accepting the provisional bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that when criminal antecedent of the petitioner was verified, it was found that he had antecedent of more than two cases, as such, his provisional anticipatory bail bonds was cancelled and the petitioner was taken in custody on 19.11.2025. It is next submitted that thereafter petitioner moved before this Court seeking regular bail by filing Cr. Misc. No.88817 of 2025 and the same came to be rejected by an order dated 16.01.2026 with liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is next submitted that charges against the petitioner stands framed by an order dated 16.01.2026 as would manifest from Annexure-P/3. It is also submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the trial to prove his innocence.

4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Marhowrah P. S. Case No. 331 of 2024.

6. The application stands allowed.

7. However, it is made clear that if the learned trial court comes to a conclusion that petitioner after his release is trying the delay the trial in any manner, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

vikash/-

U T