SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 10047

PATNA HIGH COURT
Akash Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.541 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-284 Year-2024 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran ======================================================

XXXXX ... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Shashi Ranjan S/o Manoj Singh R/o Village - Mura, P.S - Garkha, District -

Saran ... ... Respondent/s ======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Dr. Alok Kumar Alok, Advocate For the State : Mr.Sunil Kumar Pandey, APP ======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA

ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 09-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. However, there is no representation on behalf of opposite party no. 2 despite valid service of notice. 2. From perusal of record, it transpires that in the revision petition, the identity details of the Juvenile is being disclosed, which is against the statutory provisions prescribed under Section 74 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 which mandates protection of disclosure of identity of the juvenile in conflict with law. Therefore, the id

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top