##PAGE1##

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6193 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1068 Year-2025 Thana- KANKARBAG District- Patna

======================================================

Aman Kumar S/O Vijay Kumar Ray Resident of Mohalla- Loha Chapra, P.S-

Khaira, District- Saran at Chapra.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Puja Kumari D/O Jitendra Singh Resident of Rajendra Nagar, P.S

-Agamkuan , District- Patna, Permanent resident of Village- Singhiyan, P.S-

Bhawanipur, District- Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Shanker Pankaj, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Vinod Shanker Modi, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY

ORAL ORDER

2 04-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest

in connection with Kankarbagh P.S. Case No. 1068 of 2025

dated 19.11.2025 instituted for the offences punishable under

Sections 69/352/321(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he had

sexually exploited the informant on the promise of marriage and

subsequently denied to marry her.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

from the admission of the informant, it would appear that she

agrees to the fact that the petitioner and the informant knew

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6193 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026

2/3

each other since 2022 and they were in a relationship and only

when the petitioner showed his inability to marry her, the

present case has been lodged. It has further been submitted that

admittedly the petitioner and the O.P. No. 2 were in love affair

and, therefore, there was no forceful making of physical

relationship with the informant and only when the petitioner did

not agree to marry her, the present false and concocted case has

been lodged against him. The petitioner has clean antecedent.

5. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State has

vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner is

directed to be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or

surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks

from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, on

his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

XI, Patna in connection with Kankarbagh P.S. Case No. 1068 of

2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482

of the BNSS and subject to the following conditions:-

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the

petitioner;

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6193 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026

3/3

(ii) the petitioner will remain present on each and

every date fixed by the Court below, if so required by the

learned Trial Court;

(iii) in case of absence on two consecutive dates or in

violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bonds of the petitioner

will liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned;

(iv) the Court below shall verify the criminal

antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found

that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the

court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bonds of the

petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the

above mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of the

same on in the name of verification.

It is made clear that the observations, if any, made in

this order, shall be of no bearing during the trial.

(Sourendra Pandey, J)

krishna/-

U T