IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84225 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-563 Year-2014 Thana- BETTIAH CITY District- West Champaran ======================================================

1. PRASAD VAZE @ PRASAD MADHAV VAZE Son of Madhav Yashwant Vaze Resident of B601, 602 Sanjog Apartments Lti Road, Near Shirine Garden Society Aundh, Pune City, Ganeshkhind District- Pune, P.S.- Aundg, Maharashtra- 411007.

2. Sagar J. Talewar @ Sagar Jaikumar Talewar Son of Jaikumar Govindrao Talewar Resident of House No. B- 604, Sus- Pashan Road, Behind Bank of Maharashtra, P.S.- Chaturshrungi (Pashan), Village- Sutarwadi, Pashan, Pune, Armament, Pashan, District- Pune, Maharasthra- 411021.

3. Jagannath Yadav Son of Shankar Yadav Resident of Flat No. 101, Nandan Villa, C/73, A.G. Colony Park, Patna, Phulwari, P.S.- Shashtri Nagar, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar

2. Suman Singh Son of Late Prem Chander Singh Resident of Village and P.O.-

Berriya, P.S.- Ramgadhwa, District- East Champaran, Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Ms.Shama Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Aslam Ansari, APP ======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

7 27-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. Despite valid service of notice no one appears on behalf of the O.P. No.2.

3. This is an application filed for quashing of Bettia (Town) P.S. Case No.563 of 2014, dated 30.09.2014, registered pursuant to the order dated 20.06.2014, passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in Complaint Case No.1130(C)/2014 for the offences punishable under Sections 384, 406, 420, 467, 468, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and for quashing of the order dated 20.06.2014 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran under Section 156(3) of Cr.PC in Complaint Case No.1130(C) of 2014 and for any other relief to which the petitioners are found entitled to in the facts of the case.

4. The present case outlines a complaint filed by one Suman Singh, former Bajaj Company Dealer in Bettiah bearing Case No.1130(C)/14 against the Chairman, Managing Director, General Manager, and other senior officials of the Company. Suman Singh, who was a dealer in the said company from 19.12.2012 to 31.09.2015, allegedly filed the complaint with malicious intent. The same was filed without following proper legal procedures, such as approaching the police or providing an affidavit as required by law. The complaint alleges that Suman Singh was unemployed and seeking business opportunities, when he found an advertisement in Dainik Jagaran Newspaper on 26.11.2010, for a Bajaj Dealership in Bettiah. He contacted the provided contact number and met Rahul Bajaj and Rajiv Bajaj.

5. The petitioners assured the complainant that they would be the sole dealer in Bettiah as they have space for constructing a workshop. They also allegedly promised a lifelong association with their dealership and financial support through Bajaj Auto Finance Limited (B.F.L). The complainant claims that he was not told that minimal investment was needed and in this manner on the assurance of the petitioners, the complainant submitted his application.

6. The accused persons conducted survey and interview in Bettiah and after selection, the company gave him letter of intent dated 12.01.2011. Thereafter, on demand, complainant gave a bank guarantee of Rs.50 lakh in favour of the accused persons. The complainant also spent Rs. 5 Crores for construction of building and other works under the influence of the accused persons.

7. It is alleged by the complainant that he was given appointment for a period of three months only i.e. from 19.12.2012 to 31.03.2013 and when he enquired about the same then appointment from 01.04.2013 to 31.03.2015 was issu