SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 12673

PATNA HIGH COURT
Sakina Khatoon
Cr.Misc.-11599/2026



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11599 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2024 Thana- PALANWA District- East Champaran ======================================================

1. Sakina Khatoon Daughter of Md. Hassan Khan @ Hassan Khan

2. Isrun Nesha Wife of Majhar Khan

3. Nuresha Khatoon Wife of Majhar Khan

4. Hasina Khatooon Wife of Md. Hassan Khan @ Hassan Khan All are Resident of Village - Gad Bahuari, P.S. - Palanwa, District - East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Madhurendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER

2 12-03-2026 Heard Mr. Madhurendra Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Palanwa P.S. Case No. 14 of 2024 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 147,148,149,447,341,323,307,354B,504,506, of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the accused persons named therein including the petitioners assaulted the informant and her family members, causing injuries to them.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioners and informant are co- villagers and there is case and counter case between them for the same occurrence, in which, both the sides have sustained injuries. Allegation against the petitioners is general and omnibus. Petitioners have clean antecedents. On these grounds, petitioners seek to be released on pre-arrest bail.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

6. Having heard the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, having perused the allegation made in the FIR and also the fact that there is case and counter case between the parties and general and omnibus allegation has been levelled against the petitioners, who are having clean antecedents, I am of the opinion that petitioners have, prima facie, made out a case to be released on pre-arrest bail. 7. The petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-

(Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Raxaul, East Champaran, Motihari / Concerned Court in connection with Palanwa P.S. Case No. 14 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section

482(2) of the BNSS.

8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and if it is found that the petitioners are involved in some other cases, as what has been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force.

(Purnendu Singh, J)

Sanjay/- U T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top