IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4648 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-750 Year-2025 Thana- RAMKRISHNANAGAR District- Patna ======================================================

Vicky Kumar Son of Sri Shyam Shundar Prasad Resident of Mohalla-

Ramnagar Jakkanpur, P.S.- Jakkanpur, Dist.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anand Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sharma ======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

3 17-03-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in Ram Krishna Nagar P. S. Case No.750 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The S.H.O. and the Investigating Officer of the case in compliance of the order dated 16.03.2026 are present in the Court.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a detailed order was recorded on 16.03.2026. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the informant alleges that on 02.09.2025, he was shot by the petitioner and became unconscious and thereafter, the nearby people took him to a hospital on 02.09.2025 itself and when he regained consciousness, he found himself in Devanti Hospital. It is submitted that from perusal of Annexure-2 to the anticipatory bail application, it would manifest that the same is injury report furnished by Palika Vinayak Hosital Private Limited. It is further submitted that from perusal of Annexure-2, it would manifest that the date of admission of the informant in the hospital is at 4:28:31 P.M. on 03.09.2025. It is next submitted that from perusal of the FIR, it would manifest that the same was instituted by the petitioner on 03.09.2025 at 6.05 P.M. It is thus submitted that if petitioner prior to that was admitted in Palika Vinayak Hopsital Private Limited at 4.28.31 P.M., then how come the said fact was not brought in the FIR. It is further submitted that informant falsely implicated the petitioner for some ulterior reason.

5. The learned A.P.P., at this stage, submits that Devanti Hopsital had issued injury report, but then, petitioner left the said hospital against medical advise and thus was declared LAMA. It is next submitted that Devanti Hosital records that petitioner was brought from Maxo Hospital, Mithapur, on which the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that all these aspect requires to be investigated thoroughly by the police, but then, police in mechanical manner is proceeding in the case and the efforts are being made to arrest the petitioner without investigating the case properly.

6. The S.H.O. and Investigating Officer of the case, who are present in the Court, seeks time.

7. Put up this case on 19.03.2026 at 12.30 P.M., when S.H.O. and Investigating Officer of the case shall remain physically present before this Court to assist the Court on the issue raised by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

8. Interim protection earlier granted to the petitioner by order dated 16.03.2026 shall continue until the anticipatory bail application is finally adjudicated by this Court.

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

vikash/-

U T