SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 11787

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
MUKESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


CRR- 2269 of 2022 -1-

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh

CRR- 2269 of 2022

Date of Decision: 17.02.2023

Mukesh Kumar

---Petitioner

versus

State of Haryana

---Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Present:

Mr. Anshuman Dalal, Advocate

for the petitioner

Mr. Gurbir Singh Sidhu, AAG, Haryana

****

JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)

1.

The petitioner through instant petition is seeking setting aside of

order dated 12.10.2022 whereby Additional Sessions Judge, Jhajjar has

dismissed application of the petitioner seeking permission to furnish bail

bonds and surety bonds.

2. The brief facts emerging from record and arguments of both sides

are that on the basis of statement of Satish Kumar, FIR No. 322 dated

5.8.2022, under Sections 354, 376-AB, 506 IPC and Sections 6 & 10 of

POCSO Act, and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act (at Police Station, Beri)

came to be registered against the petitioner. The petitioner was arrested on

08.08.2022 and remanded to police custody for one day. The petitioner was

sent to judicial custody on 09.08.2022.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top