Back
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Suresh Chand Rahi – Appellant
Versus
U.T. of chandigarh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of facts leading to the judgment concerning cheating. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties regarding the conviction. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's analysis of legal principles and observations regarding evidence. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. final ruling and adjustments to the sentence based on reformatory principles. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
JUDGMENT :
Harpreet Singh Brar, J. (Oral)
1. This order of mine shall dispose of all the above-mentioned revision petitions as they arise out of the same factual background. For the sake of brevity, the facts are taken from CRR-1802-2008.
2. These instant revision petitions have been preferred against the impugned order dated 22.08.2008 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chandigarh, dismissing the respective appeals filed by the abovementioned petitioners and upholding the impugned judgement of conviction and order of sentence dated 03.06.2003 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Chandigarh in FIR No.59 of 08.06.1995 registered under Sections 420 , 120-B of IPC at Police Station Manimajra, UT, Chandigarh. The petitioners were sentenced as under:-
Offence | Sentence |
420 IPC r/w 12 |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
