PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Suresh Chand Rahi – Appellant
Versus
U.T. of chandigarh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Harpreet Singh Brar, J. (Oral)
1. This order of mine shall dispose of all the above-mentioned revision petitions as they arise out of the same factual background. For the sake of brevity, the facts are taken from CRR-1802-2008.
2. These instant revision petitions have been preferred against the impugned order dated 22.08.2008 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chandigarh, dismissing the respective appeals filed by the abovementioned petitioners and upholding the impugned judgement of conviction and order of sentence dated 03.06.2003 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Chandigarh in FIR No.59 of 08.06.1995 registered under Sections 420 , 120-B of IPC at Police Station Manimajra, UT, Chandigarh. The petitioners were sentenced as under:-
Offence | Sentence |
420 IPC r/w 120-B IPC | R.I of 2 years with a fine of Rs.1,000/- each. In case of default in payment of fine- R.I. of 2 months. |
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
3. Briefly, the facts are that on 08.06.1995, the complainant namely Inderjit Babbar made a written complaint to the police, wherein, he alleged that on 04.06.1995, Itraj Khan (petitioner-accused in CRR-2327-2008) and Suresh Chand (petitioner No.l-accused in CRR-1802-20
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.