HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
RITU CHOPRA – Appellant
Versus
ADITYA CHOPRA AND OTHERS – Respondent
ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral) Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated 05.02.2024 (Annexure P-31), passed by learned Trial Court, whereby the evidence of the petitioner (who is plaintiff before learned Trial Court), was closed by order.
Learned counsel for the petitioner heard and the paper book has been perused.
Copies of the zimini orders, ever since framing of issues on
12.07.2023, till the passing of the impugned order, have been placed on record as Annexures P-4 to P-31.
Perusal of the aforesaid zimini orders reveals that the witnesses had been making appearance on almost all dates. Though, part examination has been conducted and if the adjournments have been granted, it was only on account of the request made or the Bar having abstained from court work or the inability expressed by witness for production of the record or the 1 of 3 witness having not made appearance, despite having been bound.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that one summoned witness Anshu Grover, who was summoned as per the list of witnesses, filed by the petitioner before the Trial Court, was partly examined. At the stage of cross-examination of the sa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.