Tarsem Chand vs Raj Kumar - 2024 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3710

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Vikas Mohan Gupta
For the Respondents: Shaveta Sanghi, V.K. Garg

Table of Content
1. challenge to compensation awarded is based on incorrect income assessment. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments presented question the adequacy of compensation awarded. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court finds bases for recalculation of compensation consistent with established laws. (Para 6 , 7)
4. final calculations are based on relevant legal precedents. (Para 8)
5. modification of award in favor of appellants. (Para 9)

CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN

Present :

Mr. Vikas Mohan Gupta, Advocate for the appellants.

Ms. Shaveta Sanghi, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 3.

Mr. V.K. Garg, Advocate for respondent No.2.

ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)

The present appeal has been filed by the claimant-appellants

challenging the quantum of compensation awarded vide award dated

01.03.2011 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mansa

(hereinafter referred to as ‘the Tribunal’).

Since the facts, as recorded in the impugned award passed by

the Tribunal, are not in dispute, the same are not being reproduced herein for

the sake of brevity.

The Tribunal in the present case had awarded the following

compensation :

Yogesh Sharma

2024.01.30 12:20

I attes