SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 6789

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
EASI MOHD ALAM ALIAS ALAM – Respondent


(211)

2023:PHHC: 006790-DB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

LPA-343-2023 (O&M)

Date of decision:- 18.01.2024

State of Haryana and others

...Appellant(s)

Versus

EASI Mohd. Alam @ Alam

...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY

Present:

Mr. Deepak Balyan, Additional Advocate General, Haryana,

for the appellants.

Mr. Mohnish Sharma, Advocate,

for the respondent.

* * * *

RITU BAHRI, A.C.J. (ORAL)

CMs-975 & 976-LPA-2023

For the reasons mentioned therein, the delay of 62 days in re-

filing and 53 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

The applications stand disposed of.

LPA-343-2023

The appellants have come up in appeal against the judgement and

order dated 19.09.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby the writ

petition filed by the petitioner (respondent herein) was allowed by quashing the

order dated 20.11.2017 (Annexure P-2) and the order dated 01.01.2018

(Annexure P-3) denying him back-wages.

2.

In the present case, FIR No. 476 dated 16.11.20

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top