2023:PHHC:057911

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

CR-4993-2022 (O&M)

Date of Decision: April 24, 2023

Mamta and another

...Petitioners

Versus

Hem Raj Khanna and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI

Present:

Mr.Ajay Jain, Advocate

for the petitioners.

Mr.Shalender Mohan, Advocate

for respondents No.1 and 2.

****

ARCHANA PURI, J.

Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated

11.10.2022 passed by learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), whereby, an

application filed by the petitioners under Order 22 Rule 10 read with

Section 151 CPC, has been dismissed.

The material facts, as culled out from the paperbook are that,

initially, respondents No.1 and 2 (who are plaintiffs before the lower Court)

had filed a suit for seeking relief of separate possession of half share

through partition by metes and bounds, in respect of shop consisting of two

'khans' bearing No.21, Ward No.XV, as detailed in paragraph 1 of judgment,

copy whereof is Annexure P-1.

As evident from the judgment dated 22.05.2018 (Annexure P-

VINEET GULATI

2023.04.26 12:57

I attest to the accuracy and

authenticity of this document

Chandigarh