IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
SURESHWAR THAKUR, J.
Amit Kumar (Deceased) – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana and another – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. analysis of section 148 (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. independence of sections 148 and 389 (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 3. modification of the order (Para 20) |
(QRAL)
1. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the date of hearing of the main case is preponed from 08.09.2022, and, is taken up today itself.
MAIN CASE
2. In consequence thereof, through a sentencing order drawn, on 16.08.2021, the learned trial Magistrate concerned, proceeded to impose, upon, the convict, sentence of simple imprisonment extending upto a term of one year, and, also made a direction, upon, the convict to pay an amount of Rs. 55,00,000/-, as compensation to the complainant — petitioner herein.
4. However, during the pendency of the apposite appeal, as, became preferred by the aggrieved-convict, the latter proceeded to also institute an application cast under Section 389 of the Cr.P.C., rather before the learned Appellate Court concerned. The learned Appellate Court concerned, through an order made thereons, on 09.09.2021 (Annexure P-3), cast the hereinafter extracted directions, upon, the appellant — convict (respondent No. 2 herein).
“The present
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.