SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1964

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SATBIR GAUTAM – Appellant
Versus
SURESH CHANDER AND OTHERS – Respondent


In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Reserved On: 31.01.2025 Pronounced On: 25.04.2025 Satbir Gautam ... Petitioner(s)

Versus Suresh Chander and Others ... Respondent(s)

CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.

Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Mr. Divanshu Kaushik, Ms. Simran Sharma and Ms. Manreet Kaur, Advocates for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Kulwinder Singh, Advocate for the respondents. Anil Kshetarpal, J.

I. Brief Facts

1. After having heard the learned counsel representing the parties, this Court is of the considered view that the petitioner is a victim of wrong legal advice which was compounded by an incorrect order passed by this Court in the previous round.

2. In this revision petition, the petitioner (defendant No.2 in a civil suit for recovery of ₹20,40,000/-) challenges the correctness of the First Appellate Court’s order dismissing his application for condonation of the delay of 1749 days in filing the appeal against an ex parte judgment and decree dated 01.12.2012.

3. The relevant facts, in brief, are required to be noticed in order to DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ understand the controversy involved in the present case. Suresh Chander and Devinder Kumar filed a suit fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top