2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1989
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J
SADHU RAM AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. – Respondent
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Shailendra Jain, Mr. Munish Kumar, Mr. Rahul, Mr. Sanjeev Majra, Mr. Raj Kapoor Malik, Mr. Abhinash Jain
For the Respondents: Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Mr. Abhinash Jain, Mr. Rahul
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA-2263-2017 (O&M) and
other connected cases Reserved on: 08.04.2025 Date of decision: 25.04.2025
SADHU RAM AND OTHERS ..Appellants Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
Present: Mr. Shailendra Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate Mr. Rahul, Advocate
for the appellant (s) (in RFA-2263 to 2271, 2275, 2277, 2278 and 2685 of 2017).
Mr. Sanjeev Majra, Advocate
for the appellants (in RFA-3219, 2445 and 2436 of 2017).
Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate
for the landowners (in RFA-2745-2017).
Mr. Raj Kapoor Malik, Advocate
for the appellant (in RFA-1825-2017). Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate for respondent No.2.
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.
Brief facts of the case:-
With the consent of learned counsel representing the parties, a batch of 19 connected regular first appeals (detail whereof is given at the foot of the judgment) shall stand disposed of by this common order.
The necessary and relevant details of the acquisition are as under:-
Sr. No. Particulars Important dates and details
1. Date of Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (in short ‘1894
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
Back
