IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Order:24.04.2025 Hardev Singh and another .Petitioners Versus Maya Ram ..Respondent CR No.884 of 2024(O&M)

Hardev Singh ...Petitioner Versus Maya Ram and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Present: Mr. Vineet Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Som Nath Saini, Advocate, for respondent no.1.

ANIL KSHETARPAL, JUDGE (Oral)

1. With the consent of the learned counsel representing the parties, two connected revision petitions shall stand disposed of by this common order.

2. CR No.396 of 2022, has been filed to challenge the correctness of the concurrent orders passed by the courts below while dismissing the defendants' application to set aside the ex-parte decree, whereas, in CR No.884 of 2024, the order passed in execution of the ex-parte decree is challenged.

3. In order to comprehend the issues involved in the present case, the relevant facts, in brief, are required to be noticed.

4. Sh. Maya Ram filed a suit against Sh. Hardev Singh and his father Sh. Jiwna Ram for grant of decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering in the peaceful possession and ownership ov