SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 2175

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
JITO DEVI AND ANRS – Appellant
Versus
YASHPAL SINGH – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

111

1. RSA-664-2014 (O&M)

Date of decision: 22.04.2025 JITO DEVI AND ORS. ..Appellants Versus YASHPAL SINGH ..Respondent

2. RSA-665-2014 (O&M)

JITO DEVI ..Appellant Versus YASHPAL SINGH AND ORS ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Present: Mr. Dhruv Mittal, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Naveen Batra, Advocate for respondent.

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J(Oral)

I. Brief facts:-

1. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, two connected regular second appeals shall stand disposed of by this common order.

2. Sh. Chuhru was in possession of land belonging to the government. He was recorded in possession of the property as ‘gair marusi’ in the revenue record. There was an allotment in his favour but litigation in the High Court was pending. He on 21.07.2004 executed an agreement to sell in favour of the plaintiff (respondent) on receipt of Rs.50,000/- as earnest money out of total sale consideration of Rs.2,20,000/-. The agreement to sell was executed with respect to 32 kanals land. It was recited in the agreement to sell that the sale deed would be executed within one year and if the pending litigation is not decided, S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top