Back
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
KULDEEP TIWARI, J
CR DAHIYA @ CHHAJU RAM DAHIYA – Appellant
Versus
UT OF CHANDIGARH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's need for registration of sale deed (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. counsel's argument against administrative inaction (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. statutory provisions governing registration and stamp duty (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. court's view on quasi-judicial function of the registrar (Para 22 , 23) |
| 5. court's dismissal of the writ petition (Para 24) |
KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL)
1. The prayer made in the instant writ petition appertains to issuance of directions upon the respondent(s), to accept the petitioner’s application for registration of sale deed and register the sale deed keeping in view the collector rates, which remained in force till 31.03.2025.
FACTUAL MATRIX
2. On 01.02.2025, the petitioner entered into a duly executed agreement to sell with one Dinesh Arora, in respect of Flat No.231 (New)/ 111 (Old), Category-A, First Floor, Punjab and Haryana High Court Advocates Cooperative House Building Society Ltd., Sector 49-A, Chandigarh, for a total sale consideration of ₹ 61,00,000/-.
3. On 19.03.2025, the petitioner purchased Indian Non-Judicial Stamp Papers for payment of stamp duty, in view of the then prevailing DEV
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
