SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 2359

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
VIJAY KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (112) CWP No. 8740 of 2025 Date of Decision : 08.04.2025 Vijay Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. Varun Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. T.P.S. Chawla, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.

Mr. Shreenath A. Khemka, Advocate for respondent No. 2 and 3.

***

Harsimran Singh Sethi J. (Oral)

1. In the present petition, the grievance being raised by the petitioner is qua the order dated 14.09.2022 (Annexure P-11) by which, the petitioner was imposed with the punishment of stoppage of one annual grade increment with cumulative effect. The further challenge is to the order dated 13.06.2024 (Annexure P-12) by which the service appeal against order dated 14.09.2022 (Annexure P-11) filed by the petitioner against the said order has been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that the petitioner was being accused of the misplacing the inquest report, which allegation has been wrongly proved against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that signatures were taken deceitfully from the petitioner while alleg

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top