SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 2699

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
(O&M) MANGE RAM – Appellant
Versus
RAM CHANDER – Respondent


DEEPAK GUPTA, J.

This is defendant’s second regular appeal against the concurrent findings of the Courts below inasmuch as suit for possession regarding the property in dispute filed by plaintiff Ram Chander (now respondent through his LRs) was decreed by the trial Court on 12.01.1989. The appeal filed by the defendant Mange Ram (now appellant through his LRs) was dismissed by the First Appellate Court on 02.02.1990.

2. In order to avoid confusion, parties shall be referred as per their status before the trial Court.

3.1 According to plaintiff Ram Chander, he is the owner/ landlord of the house in dispute, detailed in plaint, situated in village Kalawati. Said house is in possession of defendant as tenant since 28.04.1957 @ Rs.2/- per month. After the death of Neki Ram, the father of the plaintiff, the plaintiff had settled at village Kalwa and so, he had rented out the same to defendant. Bahi entry to that effect was executed by defendant. Plaintiff required the house for his personal use. It was also alleged that the defendant had not paid the rent w.e.f. 01.01.1981. Defendant also made material alterations in the house in dispute by making kacha room and khor etc.. Legal notice und

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top