SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
S.P.MALHOTRA – Appellant
Versus
U.T.CHD – Respondent


Crl. Appeal No. 220-SB of 1993

--1--

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

Crl. Appeal No. 220-SB of 1993

Date of Decision : December 24, 2008

S.P. Malhotra son of K.G. Malhotra, resident of H. No. 55, Sector 38-

A, Chandigarh.

.... Appellant.

Versus

U.T. Chandigarh

.... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER

Present:

Mr. Dinesh Goel, Advocate

for the appellant.

Mr. Ajay Kaushik, Standing Counsel

for the C.B.I.

Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate

for U.T., Chandigarh.

SHAM SUNDER, J.

This appeal is directed against the judgment

of conviction, and the order of sentence dated 20.07.1993,

rendered by the Court of Special Judge, Chandigarh, vide which

it convicted and sentenced the accused ( now appellant ), as

under:-

Crl. Appeal No. 220-SB of 1993

--2--

The offence, for

Sentence awarded

which conviction

was recorded.

------------------------

---------------------------

420 IPC

RI for three years,

Fine Rs.500/-.

In default of payment of

fine, RI for six months.

467 IPC

RI for three years,

Fine Rs.500/-.

In default of payment of

fine, RI for six months.

468 read with

RI for three years,

Section 471 IPC

Fine Rs.500/-.

In default of payment o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top