SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
SAHIL CHOPRA AND ORS – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH

Letters Patent Appeal No.799 of 2013 (O&M)

DATE OF DECI SI ON: 01.08.2013

State of Punjab and another

…..Appellants

versus

Sahil Chopra and another

.....Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTI CE SANJAY KI SHAN KAUL, CHI EF JUSTI CE

HON’BLE MR. JUSTI CE AUGUSTI NE GEORGE MASI H

Present:

Mr.P.S. Bajwa, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab

for the appellants

..

SANJAY KI SHAN KAUL, CHI EF JUSTI CE: (Oral)

CM-2125-LPA/ 2013:

The appeal has been filed after a delay of 458 days which is

more than a year and a quarter. The reasons for condonation of delay

are the normal government lethargy other than the fact that initially the

office of the Advocate General opined against filing of the appeal and

thereafter the governm ent kept on shuffling the file till opinion was

obtained to file the appeal.

In view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in

Office of the Chief Post Master General & Ors. vs. Living Media

I ndia Ltd. & Anr., 2012 ( 2) S.C.T. 269, we find ground to condone

such inordinate delay.

The apprehension of the appellants that there may be large

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top