SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
M/S FAZE THREE LTD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA & ORS – Respondent


CWP No.1973 of 2011 (O&M) 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CWP No.1973 of 2011 (O&M)

Date of decision:- 12.01.2012

M/s Faze Three Limited

....Petitioner

Vs.

State of Haryana and others

....Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL

Present:

Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Senior Advocate,

with Mr. Amit Jhanji, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Ms. Shubhra Singh, DAG, Haryana,

for respondent No.1.

Mr. Arun Walia, Advocate,

for respondent Nos. 2 to 4.

HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral)

The petitioner has sought a writ of mandamus claiming

same relief as granted to other dyeing units at Panipat in terms of the

order passed by this Court in CWP No. 8497 of 2009 titled “The

Panipat Dyers Association Vs. The State of Haryana” on 18.05.2010.

The petitioner is a dyeing unit at Panipat. With a view to

relocate the dyeing units in one area having facilities for effluent

treatment etc., a letter of allotment was issued to the petitioner on

04.06.2008 alloting a plot in Sector 29, Panipat, which area was to have

common facilities. In terms of the said letter of a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top