SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
PUSHKAR @ PUSHKARMAL – Appellant
Versus
PARMANAND – Respondent


CR No.250 of 2015

-1-

215

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CR No.250 of 2015

Date of Decision : 06.12.2017

PUSHKAR @ PUSHKARMAL

....PETITIONER

VERSUS

PARMANAND

....RESPONDENT

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.S. WALIA

Present:

Mr. Varun Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. M.S. Randhawa, Advocate for the respondent.

------

B.S. WALIA, J. (ORAL)

[1]

Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a oral prayer for correction

of typographical error in the prayer clause by stating that prayer in the

petition is for setting aside orders dated 23.12.2014 i.e. Annexures A-1

and A-2 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Narnaul, whereas

the same ought to be only for setting aside order Annexue A-1. Oral

prayer as made is allowed.

[2]

Brief facts of the case leading to the filing of the revision petition

are that a suit was filed by the plaintiff-respondent claiming that the

defendant-petitioner had taken a loan of Rs.50,000/- from him vide

Cheque No.316415 dated 16.11.2017 issued against account

No.65010143444, State Bank of Patiala, New Mandi Branch, Narnaul and

that he had encashed the same on 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top