SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
BUNTY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent


CRR-1143-2017

-1-

242

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CRR-1143-2017

Date of Decision: April 19, 2022

Bunty

.....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others

......Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ

Present:

Mr.Bhavyadeep Walia, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Ms.Sakshi Bakshi, AAG, Punjab.

........

RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.(Oral)

This revision petition has been filed impugning the order dated

08.02.2017 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala, whereby

the petitioner alongwith three other persons has been summoned by the trial

Court under Section 319 Cr.P.C. to face trial alongwith the co-accused, who

was already facing the trial.

Succinctly, the facts of the case are that Kirpal Singh son of

Darshan Singh, i.e. father of the victim, lodged an FIR in question. It was

alleged that he is a rickshaw puller and has three children, i.e. two sons and

one daughter. His daughter, i.e., the victim, was 17 years of age studying in

10+2. On 27.09.2016, he got a phone call from his son that the victim had

left the home at 6.00 a.m. and had not returned home. They made all the

efforts to trace her, but could not succeed. Later on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top